Quote of the day
“I think people have come to the sensible conclusion that you can’t say a woman’s life is more valuable than a man’s life,” retired Air Force Brig. Gen. Wilma Vaught. Perfectly sensible - except to a reactionary such as myself, who's still bitterly clinging to many un-hip notions, as well as to his guns and religion. In quoting General Wilma, columnist Gail Collins THINKS she's exposing the irrationality of those who oppose sending women into combat. After all, as EVERYONE KNOWS, equality is what this nation was founded on. By implication, those obstructionists who say women should not be exposed to front-line combat are anti-American. Here's the bottom line: Some things do not change. Human nature is one of them. The rigors of war are another. The DC Empire may proclaim equality all it wants. But in fact, human equality is a biological impossibility. It's also a social and political catastrophe when government tries to impose it - just take a look at the real-world results of trying to implement it. In fact, General Wilma is not just wrong, but disastrously so. There's a reason that men have historically gone to war, and that is to protect their future. A nation can lose many of its young men but still recover. However, if it loses its women, it will fade away. DC thinks it's replaced the old-fashioned "Band of Brothers" with the new and improved "Swarm of Siblings," but has instead landed yet another self-inflicted wound. When the history of the DC Empire is written, its epitaph will be "Death by Ideology." It'll be covered in the same chapter as the Soviet Union, which was a victim of the self-destructive idiocy of communism.


8 Comments:
It was clear that this was coming. "Don't ask, don't tell" was followed by open homosexuality in the ranks. Now we have the military's latest version of a "War on manhood".
Not everyone is equal when it comes to defending the empire. The military has different physical fitness standards for men and women, much like the dumbed down civil service tests for protected ethnic and gender groups. It's going to be all fun and games until people start getting killed. Even then no blame will be assigned to those who implemented a disastrous policy.
Naturally any real or fabricated abuse of a female P.O.W. will be leveraged as an excuse to invade/carpet bomb/occupy any nation or people identified as responsible. While it sends women into danger, the government will continue to tell us that women are special and need to be protected. The story of Jessica Lynch is a good example of the B.S. we'll soon have thrown at us.
Slim
Slim is right on target with what will happen when female POWs are abused. More war will follow.
These radical egalitarians had better be careful what they wish for. They have steadily beaten any propriety, any sense of genteel behavior toward women, out of a good many of our men. So, they may indeed get what they wish for . . . "good and hard" (with a bow to Mr. Mencken).
Regards,
David Smith
Tennessee
This whole situation comes at a time when the only memories of battle for most is starts with the first Gulf War and ends with the current imperial adventures. These wars are half-hearted, shadows of real combat. The U.S. Forces dominate with a gross disparity in technology, most of their casualties result from IED's planted by guerilla fighters whom they hardly ever see, much less engage, and they hunker down for the most part in comfy zones where the only danger is the occasional fighter who infiltrates their ranks. Let's see how this works out for them when a real war comes, outside in freezing temperatures for weeks, foraging, hand to hand combat with a determined, well trained army, slogging through swamps for days on end, or preparing defensive positions without the aid of engineers. I'm somewhat happy about the decision, as they will not be so much a problem when the time comes.
Mr. Patrick, you're so right! In many ways, we are the victims of our own success. We've made combat seem relatively easy so that it's at most merely a matter of slapping a magazine into an M-16/M-4 and proceeding to hose the enemy down, or, worse yet, merely playing at a deadly video game via unmanned drones, etc. Anybody, including a 100 lb. female, can do that, right?
Regards,
David Smith
Tennessee
Women should be barefoot, pregnant and in the kitchen cooking for their husbands. And they should obey all of the husbands' demands or face a good whipping!
I find it hard to believe any woman could have survived with George Rogers Clark on his campaign against the Brits, and their Indian allies, during the first war for independence.
Jim Boob: You're absolutely right. Men and women are exactly the same. All humans are equal, just as our liberal betters have always told us.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home